>On 7/31/13 11:31 AM, Stuart Green wrote:
>>
>> Ah-ha!! Thanks, I was looking for the buglist actually and couldn't
>> find it!
>>
>>
>> Glad to be aboard :)
>
>
>Hm. Perhaps this whole thing can be simplified.
>
>Right now we have two checks:
> - package_telnet-server_removed.xml
> - service_telnetd_disabled.xml
>
>They seem redundant, and I'm failing to find reasons against just
>deleting service_telnetd_disabled. There's no way telnet can be enabled
>if the package isn't installed, right?
>
>Is there a reason to continue maintaining both checks?