On 12/16/13, 12:51 PM, Maura Dailey wrote:
On 12/16/2013 12:46 PM, Haynes, Dan wrote:
> For the GConf checks, it looks like the content first used the
> ind-def:textfilecontent54_test and was just updated to use the
> ind-def:xmlfilecontent_test which seems like a good improvement to me.
> Just curious, has anyone considered using the unix-def:gconf_test
> If so, are there any problems with the gconf_test that make using the
> ind-def:xmlfilecontent_test more desirable? This seems to be a good
> opportunity for me to get some feedback on the usability of the
> unix-def:gconf_test from an OVAL content authoring perspective :).
I saw the test, but it doesn't seem clear how to specify where to
check for settings or if it's checking settings for a particular user.
xmlfilecontent_test is much more precise, because it allows you to
specify the exact file to check.
Love the idea though. Dan, is there sample code
(or would you be willing
to generate some)?