On 6/1/13 6:52 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
Yes, but please hold off on remediation content until the OVAL
validates per the schematron, and there is a means of handling
parameters/variables in fix content. If you don't eat your meat, you
can't have any pudding. But we should be able to have both.
The value of working sequentially doesn't make sense for such such a
parallel development effort, with members of different skill levels
For example: I've no idea how to fix the remaining OVAL issues, so
you're telling me and all other would-be contributors to completely stop
helping for awhile? What value does that add?