Leam,

Could you qualify that a bit more? It's hard to base a decision case on a recommendation without details and it might save Gabe some time.

Thanks,

Trevor

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:16 AM, leam hall <leamhall@gmail.com> wrote:
It is approved (Army). However, having worked with it I'd recommend
using a different product.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Frank Caviggia <fcaviggi@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey Gabe,
>
> I did a presentation on a RHEV system (RHEV 3.3, RHN Satellite 5.6, IdM 3.0 based on RHEL 6.5) that we are deploying at the Defence in Depth 2014 Conference here in Tyson's Corner, VA. I've posted the presentation here for everyone's convenience:
>
>      http://people.redhat.com/fcaviggi/KVM_security.pdf
>
> I'm happy to say that we should have an ICD 503 (RMF Step 5) ATO early next week.
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank Caviggia
>
> --
> Frank Caviggia
> Consultant, Red Hat
> fcaviggi@redhat.com
> (M) (571) 295-4560
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gabe Alford" <redhatrises@gmail.com>
> To: "SCAP Security Guide" <scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:50:39 PM
> Subject: Use of RHEV
>
> Hello list,
>
> I wanted to ask if anyone is using RHEV at all especially in an IC/DoD environment. Has it been approved? Secured? What issues are there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabe
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/



--
Mind on a Mission



--
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699
tvaughan@onyxpoint.com

-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --