I think that it's valuable since it's a more correct check.

Also, if FIPS checking is the next killer feature, well.....

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 10:57 PM Shawn Wells <shawn@redhat.com> wrote:

On 10/29/18 4:11 PM, Mark Thacker wrote:
> Well, checking the signatures of the RPMs verses what we posted in the
> certification would be a start. (sorry, manual there unless you
> automate using Ansible or OpenSCAP perhaps)
> You can check that the kernel is running in FIPS mode, of course, but
> I'm not sure that's all you want to check.
Current content evaluates FIPS enablement (e.g grub fips=1).

We can *easily* enhance these checks to ensure the appropriate RPMs are
installed to. If this would be valuable, it's very very quick/trivial to

>  BTW : That process of checking that the system is configured in FIPS
> does get easier in the future.....
hayyyyy I thought the first rule of $thingThatShallNotBeNamed was to not
talk about $thingThatShallNotBeNamed in public? Don't worry, I won't tell ;)
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org