Personally, I don't see the benefit of these errors that are mentioned, and they should be removed.

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:49 PM Shawn Wells <shawn@redhat.com> wrote:


On 4/5/19 7:16 AM, Watson Sato wrote:


On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM Shawn Wells <shawn@redhat.com> wrote:
When building off master, I receive the following errors:


> ./build_product rhel7
>
> ........
> Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/anssi_nt28_enhanced.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/anssi_nt28_high.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/anssi_nt28_intermediary.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/anssi_nt28_minimal.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/C2S-docker.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/docker-host.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/rhelh-stig.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/stig-ansible-tower-upstream.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/stig-http-disa.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/stig-ipa-server-upstream.profile.
> . Skipping None.Could not parse profile
> /media/psf/src/ComplianceAsCode/content/rhel7/profiles/stig-satellite-upstream.profile.

The ssg-rhel7-ds.xml appears built successfully. "xccdf info" shows the
profiles and I'm able to scan a host. But not sure what those output
lines mean -- any pointers?

These profiles are set as documentation_complete: false, and the build_rule_playbook.py is skipping them during build time.


Thank you!

Does it make sense to start a "build errors FAQ" or some other place to document common errors and what they mean? Where could be the best place for that?

Originally though something under docs/, but not sure if a wiki page is better/easier. Leaning towards everything as code though.

_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org