Personally, I think that anything marked as %config should not be checked because they are allowed to vary anyway.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:52 AM Watson Sato <> wrote:

Regarding rule "Verify file hashes with RPM", which files resides here:

From description in rule.yml I understand that altered files should be reported and, altered configuration files should be reported analyzed individually.
1. Is this the intended action? To evaluate altered configuration files?

Looking at the OVAL check, it mostly cares about altered files under /bin, /sbin ,/lib ,/lib64 or /usr (mainly executables and libraries according to comment).
2. Is this restriction only to optimize for search of libraries and binaries?
I see a slight misalignment between check and description. This way we won't be catching much changes in config files.

Watson Sato
Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc
scap-security-guide mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:

Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699 x788

-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --