Hi All,
I did some digging around with the materials that Shawn provided and the
latest STIGViewer from the website and I discovered that both the Group ID
and the Rule ID must match for the result to be applied.
I randomly changed a few items to just make *something* show up and,
indeed, when both identifiers were changed to match the version from the
published DISA STIG, they showed properly in the checklist file.
From a quick glance, it looks like the relevant material is actually in the
SSG so it may be possible to construct an XSLT that will allow an automatic
translation between the two formats.
That said, this is pretty much as far as I'm going down this rabbit hole.
Hopefully it helps.
Trevor
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Reese, Brian J CTR (US) <
brian.j.reese.ctr(a)mail.mil> wrote:
I don't think the issue with STIG Viewer not taking the xccdf
results is
because of oscap, but because the SSG content doesn't have the necessary
reference IDs.
I just tried using the RHEL 7 SSG content with the SPAWAR SCC tool and
tried importing the xccdf file into a RHEL 7 STIG checklist and it wasn't
able to match any results. My guess is that STIG Viewer uses the "Rule ID"
to match instead of the "STIG ID". The STIG IDs are in the xccdf results
file from the SSG content, but the Rule IDs are nowhere to be found. The
Rule ID is probably used because that is updated with each revision of the
STIG whereas the STIG ID is static.
v/r,
Brian Reese
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Wells [mailto:shawn@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:36 PM
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] scap-security-guide Digest, Vol 71, Issue 12
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.
----
On 8/18/17 3:43 PM, Mackanick, Jason W CIV DISA RE (US) wrote:
> While I am verifying with our end. Which file format is Trevor and
David trying to use? Also, please ensure you have the latest version
from:
Caution-http://iasecontent.disa.mil/stigs/zip/U_
STIGViewer-2.5.4.zip I am checking with my counterparts to confirm, but
we believe this has been updated for 1.2.
Hey Jason,
Here are some XCCDF and ARF result files for you to test with, in
case you don't have easy access to RHEL7 + OpenSCAP:
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-
disa/disa-arf-results.xml
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-
disa/disa-xccdf-results.xml
Also uploaded SCAP 1.2 and 1.3 formatted XCCDF checklists:
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-
disa/ssg-rhel7-xccdf-1.2.xml
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-
disa/ssg-rhel7-xccdf-1.3.xml
I've been using STIGViewer-2.5.3.jar. No change with 2.5.4.
Thanks so much for engaging on this!
Shawn
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.
fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@
lists.fedorahosted.org
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.
fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@
lists.fedorahosted.org
--
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699 x788
-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --