So, while you're moving stuff to github, can you get Mcnos to open that up, as
well as sourceforge?
-----Original Message-----
From: scap-security-guide-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of
Graham Williamson
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:36 AM
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] time to move to github?
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 22:32 -0500, Shawn Wells wrote:
On 2/17/14, 6:19 PM, Spencer Shimko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 16, 2014 04:03:24 PM Shawn Wells wrote:
To test things out (as Greg Elin suggested), I merged the code into
GitHub:
https://github.com/ssgproject
It picked up historical changes made by those who have GitHub accounts, e.g:
https://github.com/ssgproject/content/commits/master/Makefile
As mentioned, GutHub can also host HTML pages, giving us a version
controlled repo for the docs. We can CNAME
ssgproject.org against this.
https://github.com/ssgproject/ssgproject.github.io
http://ssgproject.github.io/
A few days ago I also played around with the ticket system:
https://github.com/ssgproject/content/issues
IMO, this seems like a much better community site. What's the right
way to go about this -- "just do it," or perhaps setup a poll?
I want to say +1 "just do it", but I think poll might actually be the best way
forward. Because if everyone isn't onboard, then this could possibly be the
start of a slow downward spiral.
I vote Aye.
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide