Trevor, nice work, i doubt a simple script wouldn't do what's needed
though.
Matthew Conley
912-398-6704
On Aug 18, 2017 10:15 PM, "Trevor Vaughan" <tvaughan(a)onyxpoint.com>
wrote:
Hi All,
I did some digging around with the materials that Shawn provided and the
latest STIGViewer from the website and I discovered that both the Group ID
and the Rule ID must match for the result to be applied.
I randomly changed a few items to just make *something* show up and,
indeed, when both identifiers were changed to match the version from the
published DISA STIG, they showed properly in the checklist file.
From a quick glance, it looks like the relevant material is actually in
the SSG so it may be possible to construct an XSLT that will allow an
automatic translation between the two formats.
That said, this is pretty much as far as I'm going down this rabbit hole.
Hopefully it helps.
Trevor
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Reese, Brian J CTR (US) <
brian.j.reese.ctr(a)mail.mil> wrote:
> I don't think the issue with STIG Viewer not taking the xccdf results is
> because of oscap, but because the SSG content doesn't have the necessary
> reference IDs.
>
> I just tried using the RHEL 7 SSG content with the SPAWAR SCC tool and
> tried importing the xccdf file into a RHEL 7 STIG checklist and it wasn't
> able to match any results. My guess is that STIG Viewer uses the "Rule ID"
> to match instead of the "STIG ID". The STIG IDs are in the xccdf results
> file from the SSG content, but the Rule IDs are nowhere to be found. The
> Rule ID is probably used because that is updated with each revision of the
> STIG whereas the STIG ID is static.
>
> v/r,
> Brian Reese
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Wells [mailto:shawn@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:36 PM
> To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] scap-security-guide Digest, Vol 71, Issue 12
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify
> the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a
> Web browser.
>
>
>
>
> ----
>
>
>
> On 8/18/17 3:43 PM, Mackanick, Jason W CIV DISA RE (US) wrote:
> > While I am verifying with our end. Which file format is Trevor and
> David trying to use? Also, please ensure you have the latest version
> from:
Caution-http://iasecontent.disa.mil/stigs/zip/U_STIGViewer-
> 2.5.4.zip I am checking with my counterparts to confirm, but we believe
> this has been updated for 1.2.
>
> Hey Jason,
>
> Here are some XCCDF and ARF result files for you to test with, in
> case you don't have easy access to RHEL7 + OpenSCAP:
>
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-di
> sa/disa-arf-results.xml
>
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-di
> sa/disa-xccdf-results.xml
>
> Also uploaded SCAP 1.2 and 1.3 formatted XCCDF checklists:
>
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-di
> sa/ssg-rhel7-xccdf-1.2.xml
>
Caution-http://people.redhat.com/swells/oscap-results-for-di
> sa/ssg-rhel7-xccdf-1.3.xml
>
> I've been using STIGViewer-2.5.3.jar. No change with 2.5.4.
>
> Thanks so much for engaging on this!
>
> Shawn
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedo
>
rahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@list
>
s.fedorahosted.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedo
>
rahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@list
>
s.fedorahosted.org
>
>
--
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699 x788 <(410)%20541-6699>
-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.
fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@
lists.fedorahosted.org