On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 01:40:27 AM Vincent Passaro wrote:
I’m not trying to argue that SELinux shouldn’t be enabled (I think
it
should), I’m just arguing that it should NOT be a CAT I. A CAT II I think
is completely reasonable.
Please go back and read Shawn's email. He said that it _was_ changed from cat
I to cat II. This is the patch changing it:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/scap-security-guide/2012-
October/002072.html
Was something else supposed to be patched? I think we are arguing over
something that has already been fixed.
Thanks,
-Steve