On 12/27/13, 1:04 PM, Maura Dailey wrote:
My local copy reports that it's correctly looking at
gconf.xml.mandatory for all 4 listed checks, git diff comes back
clean, and I only have one pending patch that I know about (fixing up
some missing service and package checks). If someone else could
confirm that there's a problem, I could reclone everything and try again.
The checks are against gconf.xml.defaults within the upstream git repo.
Perhaps you have local patches/branches laying around?
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/inp...
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/inp...
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/inp...
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/scap-security-guide.git/tree/RHEL/6/inp...
- Maura Dailey
On 12/26/2013 02:07 PM, Shaw, Ray V CTR USARMY ARL (US) wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> [Sorry for the delayed response, especially since I'm pretty sure I
> opened the BZ; I've been stupidly busy at work.]
>
> The checks still seem to be looking at gconf.xml.defaults for:
>
> gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_activation_enabled.xml
> gconf_gnome_screensaver_idle_delay.xml
> gconf_gnome_screensaver_lock_enabled.xml
> gconf_gnome_screensaver_mode_blank.xml
>
> Did something go awry with part of this patch? I do see the commit
> in the git log, and the "thumbnailers" check is looking at
> gconf.xml.mandatory.
--
Shawn Wells
Director, Innovation Programs
shawn(a)redhat.com | 443.534.0130
@shawndwells