Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've updated rubygem-zeitwerk from 2.5.4 to 2.6.6.
2.5.4 FTBFS with ruby3.2: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/package/rubygem-ze...
This commit is needed to fix this build error: https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk/commit/d36d646c157a3b1584035e2014b68f90829ad... and backporting this commit to 2.5.4 cannot be done cleanly. Also zeitwerk consumers are basically RoR related, and it seems upstream RoR CI already uses zeitwerk 2.6.x, so I judged that backporting the above commit to Fedora zeitwerk is waste of time, and simply updating to the newest is better.
Regards, Mamoru
Dne 22. 12. 22 v 5:01 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've updated rubygem-zeitwerk from 2.5.4 to 2.6.6.
Nice, thx. I'll be observing Koschei if there is some fallout from this (maybe this could solve the Racc / ActiveRecord issue).
Vít
2.5.4 FTBFS with ruby3.2: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/package/rubygem-ze...
This commit is needed to fix this build error: https://github.com/fxn/zeitwerk/commit/d36d646c157a3b1584035e2014b68f90829ad...
and backporting this commit to 2.5.4 cannot be done cleanly. Also zeitwerk consumers are basically RoR related, and it seems upstream RoR CI already uses zeitwerk 2.6.x, so I judged that backporting the above commit to Fedora zeitwerk is waste of time, and simply updating to the newest is better.
Regards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.o... Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org