Dne 27.5.2016 v 18:24 Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 05/20/2016 06:57 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> You probably noticed, that there is ongoing build of all Python packages
> in Copr  and today, I was approached by Miroslav Suchý, that he'd
> like to do the same for rubygems. And this in turn triggered these
> 1) Would you be interested to create ruby-sig group in FAS? We could
> make the group owner of some packages and in turn, the members of the
> group could maintain the packages, without explicitly asking for some
> 2) For the Copr rebuild of rubygems, there needs to be some FAS group
> again. Python guys are asking for "pypi-builds-sig" group , hence
> following their lead, I'd like to ask for "rubygems-builds-sig" group
> (note that although I don't like the '-sig' suffix in this case, it is
> mandated by the infrastructure ticket template).
> So what are your thoughts?
The FAS groups seem reasonable. Should reduce packaging overhead if
all goes as intended.
Is the idea behind the copr repo to eventually remove the build from
the main distro repositories? Or will they live side by side? (with
different intents / workflows)
I don't think this has anything to do with the main repo. They will live
side by side. I'd say that the level of support and assurance will be
always different. E.g. the package in the main repo must undergone
review, they are maintained by their human maintainer, while the
packages in Copr will be converted to rpm by script, there won't be
executed test suite, etc.