Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 09/02/2014 06:34 AM:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/01/2014 10:10 PM:
> Dne 27.6.2014 16:31, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>> Julian C. Dunn wrote, at 06/27/2014 11:00 PM +9:00:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test
>>> suites. We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide.
>>> Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel?
>>>
>>> I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be
>>> able to run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes.
>>
>> I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22, but not on F-21. When
>> people are working hard
>> to fix FTBFS which already appears on many rubygems related packages,
>> introducing another
>> breakage at this timing is not I am going to do.
>> Perhaps on F-22 I will make compat-package for rspec 2 series (review
>> requests needed, I will
>> create these), and maybe I will keep these compat-package even on F-23.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mamoru
>>
>
> Hi Mamoru,
>
> What is the state of this affair? Should I prepare updated RSpec 3.x
> packages for review? Or do you have something already?
Well, srpms are actually ready, just I have to do is to submit them
for review and to look for reviewer. Will do today, so please wait, thank you for
pinging.
Hello, all:
Now for F-22 rspec2 (re-)review requests are ready:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136384 rubygem-rspec2-expectations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136385 rubygem-rspec2-mocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 rubygem-rspec2-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136390 rubygem-rspec2
If these reviews pass, I will update rspec suite on F-22 to 3.0.x (i.e. on F-22
rspec 3 series will be default). Note that srpms are ready and if you want to
try please feel to take them from:
https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rspec3/
Swap reviews are welcome!
Regards,
Mamoru