If people really want to see Fedora as a first class ruby platform, I can only suggest that every question about what interpreter and gems be answered by being the first distro to be come by default as a system wide rvm based setup. rvm would answer about every discussion around "how to do it". I've been using rvm on my systems for quite some time and have had little to no problem. With a system wide rvm setup, we could effectively drop support for a lot of gem rpms and focus on making the upstream ruby a lot better.

It would certainly add to some confusion, and out of the box we'd want to deploy some basic tools and perhaps 1.8.7, but I really think it would mean a lot for ruby (a comfy path away from 1.8.x) and fedora in general to use a system-wide rvm approach.

Objections?

On Oct 23, 2010 11:12 AM, "Gaveen Prabhasara" <gaveen@owain.org> wrote:

2010/10/23 Guillermo Gómez <guillermo.gomez@gmail.com>:

>  Ruby webserver
>> ==============
>>
>> Mostly passenger vs. thin vs. unicorn. Passenger has the a...

And there's Mongrel2 [1] also.


> ------------------------
> Guillermo
> ------------------------

[1] http://mongrel2.org/
--
Gaveen Prabhasara

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.o...