Hi,
I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
Pagure.
OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.
I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning. But the macro variable is defined as a module scope. Ref. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/perl.yaml#_161
%{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct. I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and also refer above Perl's logic.
%{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}
Jun
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena pvalena@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" vondruch@redhat.com To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in Pagure.
Thx
Vít
Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
Hello,
I am working for ruby module. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
dtrace
command), such as below macro.
%global with_rubypick 1
Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros? Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
%{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
And then override it on module to 0.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Pavel
Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not
right
now.
Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
Jun