On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 17:13 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I did a blog post on this subject, showing off a local build of a
compat-ruby-1.9.1 package I've made. I'm still working on some of the
other troubles all of that introduces, but I wanted to let you know
where I'm thinking it could be heading towards.
Does that mean that you'd also want to change the packaging guidelines
so that rpm's installs into the vendor directories rather than site ? I
don't have a strong opinion either way, but think we should calrify
Also, what's everybody's sense of how best to do the switch ? Should F13
ship with 1.9.x as the default ruby ? Do we need 1.8.x compat packages ?