On 03/22/2011 05:24 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Rich
Mattes<richmattes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry about that. I was waiting for feedback from you to see if you wanted
> to post the review. I've gone ahead and done so, you can find it at
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677496
>
> I'd be happy to add you as a comaintainer once the package is accepted.
Hi Rich!
Has the review progressed? I don't think I have the karma or
experience to be the reviewer. Anyway, I've just filed a review
request for a trivial lego-udevrules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689961 so that nbc and
nxt_python can coexist...
Happy to comaintain, anytime :-)
cheers,
m
Hi Martin,
There have been a few comments on the package, but nobody has picked up
the review yet. These review requests take time, especially if you're
not actively soliciting for reviewers. I may have time to solicit for a
review swap sometime soon, but until then I'll have to wait and see if
anyone picks it up.
Once lego-udevrules gets approved, I'll be happy to edit nbc to require
it instead of providing its own udev rule.
Rich