/*Rich Mattes <richmattes(a)gmail.com>*/ wrote on 01/16/2011 3:23:49 AM +0350:
On 01/13/2011 05:39 PM, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> On 13.01.2011 23:34, Rich Mattes wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Tim Niemueller<tim(a)niemueller.de>
wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.01.2011 23:12, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>>>> In anaconda package customization UI, the left column shows categories
>>>> (Desktop Environment, Applications, Server ...) and the right column
>>>> shows groups of the selected category.
>>>> Package groups are organized in comps.xml itself, so there is no need to
>>>> change anything in the packages themselves.
>>> Ok, Rich, which category is the Robotics Suite in?
>>>
>>> The package group was just mixed in, I want to propose a package group
>>> specific to robot software, we have quite a few packages to which this
>>> could apply.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>> I think we fit best in the Development category. I'm creating a new group
>> inside of the development category for our packages, called Robotics Suite,
>> which will contain the robotics related stuff. I'm just not sure whether or
>> not it makes more sense to list the -devel packages or the base packages for
>> our stuff (or both). For instance, should I include player-devel and/or
>> player? mrpt-devel and/or mrpt? I'm leaning towards including devel
>> packages instead of base ones, since tutorials will probably rely on them at
>> some point.
> I agree with the category and I suggest to add both, base and devel
> packages.
>
> Tim
>
>
Please have a look at [1] and see if I missed anything. I've been using
[2] as a guide on how to do things; the diff is against the f15-comps file.
Thanks
Rich, that looks fine. :)
I also went ahead and adjusted the wiki pages. fp.o/wiki/Robotics
is
now the showcase page, and fp.o/wiki/SIGs/Robotics now holds the old
robotics sig page.
Great!
Good luck,
Hedayat