Great, lets spin off another thread about rhq-metrics on a multi-node architecture. You've got a better understanding of the rhq side of things and cassandra, but maybe i can contribute some insights about the wf domain mode.




Am 09.01.2015 um 17:54 schrieb John Sanda <jsanda@redhat.com>:

The only reason I made a distinction is because we have been supporting an in-memory backend in addition to Cassandra for a particular use case which is a developer working with WildFly who wants to get up an running quickly. The biggest challenge I see with right now with respect to domain mode or multi-node (i.e., multiple instances of rhq-metrics service) deployments in general is coordination. We can implement a solution that utilizes Cassandra in order to avoid additional external dependencies. Work on that has not started but it is something I have been thinking about.

On Jan 9, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Heiko Braun <ike.braun@googlemail.com> wrote:



when talking about wildfly, we need to consider both: standalone and domain.

this is a common mistake many contributors do and then they are surprised their potential contribution is not accepted.

so for rhq-metrics, integrated into wildfly, it has to be all or nothing. 

On 09 Jan 2015, at 14:34, John Sanda <jsanda@redhat.com> wrote:

but let’s consider the single WildFly instance. 

_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel

_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel