On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:22 +0100, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:06 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:17 +0100, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I just pushed a branch with support for pure webapp deployment of the
> > dummy application and also some lightweight testing options.
> >
> > Can you do cast your eye over the changes on origin/pure-webapp before I
> > do the same for the powershell app?
>
> Looks great, I've only fairly nitpicky comments:
>
> - It looks like git supports symlinks, but not on Windows 2003 -
> apparently it works fine on 2008
So can we ignore the possibility that folks might wanna checkout on
Win'03?
RHEV-M 2.1 required '03, but 2.2 works on '08
So, just go for it and we'll require developers have '08
e.g.
$> ln -s b a
$> git commit a
If it causes problems down the road, it's easy to revert to a manually
maintained copy
> - We can probably dump the "deploy to JBoss"
instructions for the
> dummy backend - jetty is much easier for people
Yeah, I kinda agree. However, we'll still need some level of testing
against JBoss, for example I wouldn't have tripped over that
classloading issue if I'd relied on jetty only.
Hmm. So, for people using the powershell backend in anger, what would we
recommend - deploying to JBoss, or something more lightweight?
Anwyay, thanks again - this is going to make things a lot easier to work
with
Cheers,
Mark.