siosm commented on the pull-request: `Use unified core mode for Silverblue & Kinoite`
that you are following:
``
I'm trying to understand why this is failing but I can not see a difference in the
content of `/usr/lib/ostree-boot` between a commit with and one without unified-core:
```
# Without unified core, current Fedora Kinoite
$ sudo tree /usr/lib/ostree-boot/
[sudo] password for tim:
/usr/lib/ostree-boot/
├── efi
│ └── EFI
│ ├── BOOT
│ │ ├── BOOTIA32.EFI
│ │ ├── BOOTX64.EFI
│ │ ├── fbia32.efi
│ │ └── fbx64.efi
│ └── fedora
│ ├── BOOTIA32.CSV
│ ├── BOOTX64.CSV
│ ├── grubia32.efi
│ ├── grubx64.efi
│ ├── mmia32.efi
│ ├── mmx64.efi
│ ├── shim.efi
│ ├── shimia32.efi
│ └── shimx64.efi
├── grub2
│ ├── fonts
│ │ └── unicode.pf2
│ └── grubenv
└── symvers-6.1.7-200.fc37.x86_64.gz -> /lib/modules/6.1.7-200.fc37.x86_64/symvers.gz
```
```
# With unified core, latest Kinoite nightly
$ sudo tree /usr/lib/ostree-boot/
[sudo] password for kinoite:
/usr/lib/ostree-boot/
├── efi
│ └── EFI
│ ├── BOOT
│ │ ├── BOOTIA32.EFI
│ │ ├── BOOTX64.EFI
│ │ ├── fbia32.efi
│ │ └── fbx64.efi
│ └── fedora
│ ├── BOOTIA32.CSV
│ ├── BOOTX64.CSV
│ ├── grubia32.efi
│ ├── grubx64.efi
│ ├── mmia32.efi
│ ├── mmx64.efi
│ ├── shim.efi
│ ├── shimia32.efi
│ └── shimx64.efi
├── grub2
│ ├── fonts
│ │ └── unicode.pf2
│ └── grubenv
└── loader
└── entries
```
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1115