till reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` When a branch such as epel is retired, something needs to make sure that the bugzilla assignee is also set to orphan. Ideally people could not even report new bugs (not sure if this was implemented with the pkgdb2 setup). With pkgdb2 it just managed this, not sure what could be a good tool right now. Maybe something that checks on pdc branch retirements and then updates fedora-scm-requests?
We also need to make sure that when we unretire things, that we set the bugzilla owner to the requester. I mentioned this here: https://pagure.io/fedrepo_req/issue/64
@ralph @mprahl ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6957
mprahl added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @till I think we could add this functionality to the Bugzilla owner/cc sync script, but I don't know how we'd manage the access needed to fedora-scm-requests from the host that's running the script.
Any ideas? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6957
till added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @mprahl, where is the Bugzilla owner script running? Is it the dist-git-pagure host? AFAICS pagure has a remote-edit feature for files in repos, maybe this can be used for this.
Another issue is that it seems that this is not on branch granularity but only differentiates between Fedora and EPEL. Just wondering, if someone uses a custom branch for Fedora modularity, how will this be mapped to Bugzilla? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6957
The issue: `Set bugzilla assignee to orphan for retired branches/packages` of project: `releng` has been assigned to `ralph` by ralph.
ralph added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Hm, well, here's a start:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/A3WUpxQOagtmoJ5eOPTaMg
That queries PDC for retirement status *before* consulting the overrides.. which seems simpler to me than trying to sync everything to the overrides repo all the time.
I'm not sure yet about how to map default assignees for "arbitrary" branches, though. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6957
ralph added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` OK - I applied that here: https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=d7c7875...
We can rewrite, revise as necessary. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6957
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Matt Prahl -
Ralph Bean
-
Till Maas