jsteffan opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` Update multilib to allow memtest86+ ia32 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1173
adamwill commented on the pull-request: `Update multilib to allow memtest86+ ia32` that you are following: `` Why would we want this? We are generally trying to get rid of ia32 stuff, not add more. I've looked at the bug report, but AFAICS there's no explanation of the *why*. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1173
jsteffan commented on the pull-request: `Update multilib to allow memtest86+ ia32` that you are following: `` There are ia32 BIOS/UEFI bootloaders out in the wild and I'd like to see parity with capabilities vs architecture. With this change, it will go away when there is no longer a %{ix86} builder available.
This seems like a reasonable exception to provide the full capabilities of memtest86+. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1173
jsteffan commented on the pull-request: `Update multilib to allow memtest86+ ia32` that you are following: `` After needing to make some compromises regarding disk layout for this package, it's not worth fighting to make this multilib. I'm withdrawing this request. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1173
jsteffan closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Closed pull-request:
`` Update multilib to allow memtest86+ ia32 ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Jonathan Steffan