dustymabe opened a new pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following: `` cloud: remove s390x from image builds ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` FYI @sharkcz ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
sharkcz commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` OK, hopefully we can enable that again after @kevin is back and he finishes the infra migration under KVM. Because it's still just the infra that doesn't cooperate sometimes, I can't see anything wrong with the distro.
Also can't we just make another config and job for s390x? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: ``
OK, hopefully we can enable that again after @kevin is back and he finishes the infra migration under KVM. Because it's still just the infra that doesn't cooperate sometimes, I can't see anything wrong with the distro.
+1 - I'm perfectly fine with re-enabling it, but continuously watching it fail gives me anxiety
Also can't we just make another config and job for s390x?
just so it can fail in the same way? i'd prefer to keep the config integrated like it is. It's no biggie to re-enable when we think we've fixed it. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
sharkcz commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` From what I can see the s390x failures aren't consistent, they are spread across all releases, 1/2 fails, 1/2 succeeds. And not always it's s390x what makes the compose fail.
Let's wait for the new infra and see what change it will make. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
mohanboddu commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` @dustymabe Can you make it failable rather than removing it totally?
Making it failable will still try to compose it but if the s390x image fails, it wont fail the entire compose. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: ``
From what I can see the s390x failures aren't consistent, they are spread across all releases, 1/2 fails, 1/2 succeeds. And not always it's s390x what makes the compose fail.
well for the specific compose I'm disabling s390x for in this PR (f30 cloud) it fails pretty consistently.
Let's wait for the new infra and see what change it will make.
I'd rather add it back once the new infra is in place.
@mohanboddu: @dustymabe Can you make it failable rather than removing it totally? Making it failable will still try to compose it but if the s390x image fails, it wont fail the entire compose.
We'll still get a notification because it will be `FINISHED_INCOMPLETE` so that doesn't help.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/1956 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
dustymabe commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` https://pagure.io/dusty/failed-composes/issue/1968
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
kevin commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` I think this is moot now right, it's been compiling fine for a while, can we just close this? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
mohanboddu commented on the pull-request: `cloud: remove s390x from image builds` that you are following: `` Closing this PR as its not required anymore ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/731
mohanboddu closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `pungi-fedora` that you are following.
Closed pull-request:
`` cloud: remove s390x from image builds ``
rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dan Horák -
Dusty Mabe
-
Kevin Fenzi
-
Mohan Boddu