rel-eng February 2019

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
265 discussions

[releng] Issue #8167: Please unblock python-svgwrite for f30
by Vojtěch Trefný 26 Feb '19

26 Feb '19

vtrefny reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue python-svgwrite was unretired recently -- https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8136 -- but the f30 I've requested is currently blocked $ koji list-pkgs --package python-svgwrite --show-blocked ... python-svgwrite f30 releng [BLOCKED] `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8167

2 2

[releng] Issue #8169: Unorphan python-rdflib
by Nils Philippsen 26 Feb '19

26 Feb '19

nphilipp reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` I'd like to take over maintenance of the `python-rdflib` package which popped up in this week's round of new orphans, because the `lv2` package, which I co-maintain, depends on it. This seems to be a case similar to issue #8124, the package still has maintainers 'left', so shouldn't be orphaned in the first place. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8169

2 2

[releng] Issue #8162: Remove Axel Thimm from all projects
by Stephen J Smoogen 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

smooge reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Describe the issue I am opening this ticket as it seems this account is still associated with packages so various ownerships are still trying to send to their dead email account. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) Low Priority * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? We have usually several thousand emails in the queue for this domain due to various projects they were associated with. Packagers are also trying to contact Axel for things which is causing confusion. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8162

3 3

[releng] PR #8163: Add f31 to the container release script
by Clement Verna 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

cverna opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Add f31 to the container release script `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8163

2 1

[releng] PR #8164: Rawhide is now F31
by Mohan Boddu 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

mohanboddu opened a new pull-request against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` Rawhide is now F31 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/8164

1 1

[releng] Issue #8154: unretire and unorphan ghc-setlocale
by Jens Petersen 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

petersen reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? ghc-setlocale * FAS username of the new maintainer? petersen * Branches that you need it to be unretired for? f30 master * Package re-review BZ URL? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678677 * Any extra information? Recently got auto-retired, due to getting orphaned somehow :-( `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8154

2 2

[releng] Issue #8155: unretire and unorphan ghc-fgl again
by Jens Petersen 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

petersen reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? ghc-fgl * FAS username of the new maintainer? petersen * Branches that you need it to be unretired for? f30 master * Package re-review BZ URL? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678684 * Any extra information? I unretired it last year in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7549 but seems it was never unorphaned properly, so it got auto-retired again :-( `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8155

2 2

[releng] Issue #8156: unretire and unorphan ghc-pcap
by Jens Petersen 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

petersen reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` * Name of the package? ghc-pcap * FAS username of the new maintainer? petersen * Branches that you need it to be unretired for? f30 master * Package re-review BZ URL? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678752 * Any extra information? Recently got auto-retired unfortunately due to being in orphaned state somehow. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8156

2 2

[releng] Issue #8161: Unable to retire php-Pimple from epel7
by Troy Dawson 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

tdawson reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` php-Pimple was obsoleted by php-pimple. In Fedora, it was retired in August 2015. I am trying to retire it in epel7, but I am unable to. I keep getting the following error. [php-Pimple (epel7)]$ fedpkg retire "Obsoleted by php-pimple" rm '.gitignore' rm 'php-Pimple.spec' rm 'sources' [epel7 ebfd592] Obsoleted by php-pimple 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 121 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 .gitignore create mode 100644 dead.package delete mode 100644 php-Pimple.spec delete mode 100644 sources Enumerating objects: 4, done. Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (1/1), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 281 bytes | 281.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 0), reused 2 (delta 0) remote: Unspecified ref refs/heads/epel7 is blocked remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/epel7' for user 'tdawson' remote: All changes have been rejected To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-Pimple ! [remote rejected] epel7 -> epel7 (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://tdawson@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-Pimple' Could not execute retire: Failed to execute command. I have been able to retire other packages, before, and after this, so it's not permissions. I've completely cleaned out and re-cloned the directory, so I don't think it's that. I honestly don't care if I do this, or someone else does. If someone could retire php-Pimple (not php-pimple) from epel7, I would appreciate it. See the following bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673634 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8161

2 2

[releng] Issue #8160: libp11-0.4.7-1.el7 needs to be untagged from epel7
by Troy Dawson 25 Feb '19

25 Feb '19

tdawson reported a new issue against the project: `releng` that you are following: `` libp11 was retired from epel7 Apr 30 2018, when it was renamed to openssl-pkcs11. I don't know why, but libp11-0.4.7-1.el7 wasn't untagged from epel7. This is affecting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673203 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8160

2 2

← Newer
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng February 2019