#1981: evolution-zimbra retired from Rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1981: evolution-zimbra retired from Rawhide
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mbarnes | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
I have retired the evolution-zimbra package. Please block it from the
Fedora 12 collection.
dead.package states:
Zimbra 5 provides CalDAV and LDAP services which Evolution supports by
default. This extension package is obsolete.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1981>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
#1980: Purge orphans
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1980: Purge orphans
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 12 Alpha | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
All unblocked orphans need to be purged by feature freeze.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1980>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
#1930: Kill F9
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1930: Kill F9
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
We'll need to coordinate bodhi not accepting new requests with koji
killing the build target and locking the tags with the last updates push
and the announcement.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1930>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
#1979: Remove epel-release from rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1979: Remove epel-release from rawhide
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: stahnma | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
I have marked epel-release as a dead.package in devel branch. Please
remove it from the composing of rawhide.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1979>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
Updated Fedora 12 Schedule (take 2)
by John Poelstra
Here is the outcome of the meeting today (previously announced on the
list. Naturally if there is disagreement in what was proposed it can be
discussed and considered for adjustment:
o we made sure there were enough blocker bug review meetings ahead of
each freeze and test release candidate creation
o we will not create Release Candidates if there are bugs remaining on
the the blocker list
o if we cannot create the Release Candidates because the blocker list is
not clear we will move to slip the release a week
o at the final blocker review on Monday, 2009-10-26 if the blocker list
is clear we will move forward with the release–regardless of what might
be found after the fact because of the inability to unwind PR activities
that have been set in motion.
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng.ics
Thanks again to everyone for their time!
John
14 years, 9 months
#1976: remove php-pecl-Fileinfo and php-pecl-phar from Rawhide
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1976: remove php-pecl-Fileinfo and php-pecl-phar from Rawhide
------------------+---------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: remi | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
------------------+---------------------------------------------------------
remove php-pecl-Fileinfo and php-pecl-phar from Rawhide now provided by
main php (PHP-5.3.0 freshly available)
* Fileinfo extension provided by php-common
* Phar extension provided by php-common
* Phar command provided by php-cli
Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1976>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
#1977: Block "bchunk" from "devel" - dead.package
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1977: Block "bchunk" from "devel" - dead.package
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mschwendt | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Package "bchunk" has been marked "dead.package" in cvs devel.
Please block it from dist-f12.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1977>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
14 years, 9 months
Re: Updated Schedule for F12
by John Poelstra
James Laska said the following on 07/10/2009 11:43 AM Pacific Time:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:12 +0000, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 17:00 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>>> o Added earlier blocker review days (f13)
>>> o Changed usage of "Release Candidate" (f13)
>>> o Fixed dates for Beta phase so that "to" and "from" dates are
>>> correct
>>> in the context of the report (notting)
>>>
>>> http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-12/f-12-releng-tasks.html
>>>
>>> Hopefully this version is a good starting point for the meeting f13
>>> said
>>> he would arrange with QA at Monday's meeting.
>>>
>> Hrm, something is still missing. Here is the feedback that I gave
>> James.
>>
>>
>>
>> Blocker Reviews) we need a blocker review day to happen with enough time
>> for maintainers to react and fix things prior to the freeze. I see
>> there are ones scheduled for the 17th, 24th, and 31st, with the freeze
>> being Aug 4th. This is good, but is there a good reason to have 3
>> before the freeze, rather than 2? Just curious. Also curious (and
>> forgetful) what the reason is we are doing these on Fridays. What's
>> missing here is a review of the blocker bugs just before the RC compose
>> (is this implicit?) as well as one /after/ the RC compose and testing.
>
> All good points. I'm not too worried about the number. I think our
> intent is in the right place to address the issues we had during F11;
> more blocker bug days, and earlier.
>
<full cut>
Trying to consume all of these emails and know which changes to make or
not make is more than my little brain can handle :) I really do want to
understand the methodology and nuance so I can template the tasks correctly.
Can we meet at 1 PM EDT/10 AM PDT tomorrow (Monday) using Fedora Talk
and Gobby? Fedora Talk extension: 2009. This should work well
(hopefully) because the releng meeting is at 2 PM EDT (or at least it
was last week).
I will put a full text version of detailed schedule on Gobby and we can
start at the top and run it all the way through to the bottom. This
will be much faster for me and hopefully for everyone else too.
Thanks,
John
14 years, 9 months