I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged- builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged- builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.
I think putting GPL2+ on them is a reasonable choice.
The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time that we had a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it there, but yes, we haven't needed it lately.
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 10:12 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged- builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.
I think putting GPL2+ on them is a reasonable choice.
Can you be a bit more definitive about stats-bodhi, since AFAICS, it was initially written by Lukas? I'm not sure the above is quite definitive enough for code that isn't entirely yours.
The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time that we had a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it there, but yes, we haven't needed it lately.
You should have commit access to the repo, so can you just stick a license line in the file for that one? Thanks :)
Can you be a bit more definitive about stats-bodhi, since AFAICS, it was initially written by Lukas? I'm not sure the above is quite definitive enough for code that isn't entirely yours.
See Lukas' response, pushed.
The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time that we had a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it there, but yes, we haven't needed it lately.
You should have commit access to the repo, so can you just stick a license line in the file for that one? Thanks :)
Also pushed.
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Kamil Paral -
Lukas Brabec