Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote:

I would try not to go the third way, because that is really prone to erros IMO, and I'm not sure that "per context" is always right. So for me, the "TCMS" part of the data, should be:

1. testcases (with required fields/types of the fields in the "result

response" 2) testplans - which testcases, possibly organized into groups. Maybe even dependencies + saying "I need testcase X to pass, Y can be pass or warn, Z can be whatever when A passes, for the testplan to pass"

But this is fairly complex thing, to be honest, and it would be the first and only useable TCMS in the world (from my point of view).

I have rather different opinions, actually...but I'm not working on this right now and I'd rather have something concrete to discuss than just opinions :)