On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:32:29 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I've posted a comparison between Sphinx and Dexy [1] - as
well as
> updated the phabricator ticket [2]. The tools are pretty similar in
> what they can produce, so it really comes down to what people are
> comfortable with. The learning curve for Dexy isn't steep, and I
> think it's just enough easier to use compared to Sphinx for our
> purposes.
I wondered why I hadn't seen it at Fedora Planet (neither your
previous blogpost), and it's because your RSS feed is no longer
updated:
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/feeds/fedora.atom.xml
> I wasn't able to find air-tight reasoning for one over the other for
> qa-devel work - but found dexy a bit easier to use and template.
> Source for both tutorials can be found on my bitbucket profile [3].
Thanks. Can you move it into our team repo list?
https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa
>
> // Roshi
>
> [1]
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org/comparing-dexy-and-sphinx.html
> [2]
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T39
> [3]
https://bitbucket.org/Rorosha/doc-tools
>
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list
qa-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
I've fixed the RSS issue. As for moving the repo - I think it makes
more sense to move the tutorial source to taskotron (instead of the
team repo list) once we decide the tool we want to use for docs - Unless
there's a real need for the demo to be on the team page that I'm not
seeing.
// Roshi