qa-devel August 2015

qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
13 discussions

[Fedora QA] #436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab
by fedora-badges 20 Apr '16

20 Apr '16

#436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: atodorov | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- = bug description = Currently systems in Beaker lab can be accessed only through bastion.fp.o which is not as convenient as direct SSH into the system. There's also the question whether or not to open the systems directly to the Internet. This needs to be discussed with infra. Filing here so it doesn't get lost. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

2015-08-24 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes
by Tim Flink 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

================================= #fedora-meeting-1: fedoraqa-devel ================================= Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-08-31/fedoraqa-devel… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-08-31/fedoraqa-devel… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-08-31/fedoraqa-devel… Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (tflink_, 14:01:52) * status updates (tflink, 14:04:55) * got taskotron mostly working with bodhi2 - tflink/kparal (tflink, 14:05:21) * disposable clients are working well enough to use for dev work (tflink, 14:05:21) * Added test coverage for weak dependencies to depcheck, all tests pass - handsome_pirate (tflink, 14:05:21) * switch from TAP to YAML for inter-directive communication and results representation in libtaskotron. Early WIP of the result-yaml format: https://bitbucket.org/fedoraqa/resultyaml - tflink, jskladan (tflink, 14:05:21) * OpenQA - added updates.img via local media test - jsedlak (tflink, 14:05:21) * Bodhi2 and Fedmsg emission (tflink, 14:10:19) * Remaining Disposable Client Work (tflink, 14:16:45) * Tasking (tflink, 14:23:14) * Upgrading to Fedora 22 (tflink, 14:39:43) * ACTION: tflink to sync up with docs team to make sure that we keep the buildbot roles compatible with el7 (tflink, 14:49:05) * Open Floor (tflink, 14:51:51) * new taskotron logo (tflink, 14:54:29) * Open Floor (tflink, 15:04:33) Meeting ended at 15:06:12 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tflink to sync up with docs team to make sure that we keep the buildbot roles compatible with el7 Action Items, by person ----------------------- * tflink * tflink to sync up with docs team to make sure that we keep the buildbot roles compatible with el7 * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (120) * kparal (35) * handsome_pirate (10) * nirik (9) * garretraziel (7) * lbrabec (7) * zodbot (5) * tflink_ (4) * bexelbie (2) * Corey84 (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 1

openQA report-results failures
by Adam Williamson 28 Aug '15

28 Aug '15

Hi folks - after jsedlak mentioned last night that the report-results attempt for the Beta TC1 openQA run had failed and he had to run it again manually, I twiddled openQA-python-client a bit today: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA-python-client/commit/ec48e8d70964 8d10011096dfa4b897a7b28a6137 it ought to retry requests that hit 500, 501, 502, 503 or 504 errors up to 5 times. If it still fails after 5 times or hits some other 'bad' response (4xx or 505) it'll raise an exception. I've bumped BOS to this latest version, hopefully it should make things a bit more robust. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

2015-08-24 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting
by Tim Flink 24 Aug '15

24 Aug '15

# Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2015-08-24 # Time: 14:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net We've had more folks show up for the qa-devel meetings lately so in the interest of not spending too much time on the status updates, please put noteworthy accomplishments under the status update section of the wiki page for this meeting: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/w/20150824-fedoraqadevel-meeti… It's been a while since we've had a meeting and I suspect we'll take up most of the hour. Tim Proposed agenda =============== Status Updates -------------- - Please put #info statements into the wiki page for the meeting prior to the meeting start Current Work ------------ - Disposable Clients - Bodhi2 and/or Fedmsg emission Tasking ------------------------ - Who's working on what? Possible Topics and Upcoming Things ----------------------------------- - Upgrading production machines to f22 Open Floor ---------- - TBD

2 2

openQA URL POSTing
by Adam Williamson 24 Aug '15

24 Aug '15

So I actually got a very dumb implementation of POSTing an ISO URL for openQA to work: https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/pull/426 I think there would be quite a lot more work to do a *non*-dumb implementation, though. At least this should kinda point up where the bits go. I'll see if I get some time to work on it this weekend. (for those who don't know what I'm talking about - it would be nice if we could make an openQA API request like "download this ISO, then schedule jobs for it". Right now openQA doesn't implement this, you can only tell it to schedule jobs for an ISO that's already present on the server; it expects something outside of openQA to take care of providing ISOs. We'd like to be able to schedule openQA runs from systems other than the server and systems that share storage with it or can directly transmit files to it, though.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

2 1

QA Apps and Bodhi 2.0
by Tim Flink 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

I suspect that most folks here are aware of this by now but Bodhi is scheduled to be upgraded to 2.0 on 2015-09-19 and we've been trying to make sure that all QA apps are ready for the upgrade. From a software perspective, the bits that are most affected are blockerbugs, libtaskotron and resultsdb. Since packagers are going to start seeing the rpmlint results in bodhi now, I suspect that we'll start receiving complaints about the utility/strictness of that check before long. We should make sure that we're keeping close eye on devel@ and IRC to respond to any bugs/suggestions/compaints. I've outlined summaries of what I know about at the moment below. Please update this if I've missed something, got something wrong or some part of this changes. Tim Blockerbugs ----------- Needed some changes in the way that it syncs with bodhi. There is no way to test these changes before things go live but it shouldn't explode when bodhi changes so long as it's upgraded at pretty much the same time. https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T569 libtaskotron ------------ This has been a bit bigger task than we were hoping. For now, the absolute essentials work but the bodhi_comment is not currently working so notifications of taskotron failures to packagers will not work once bodhi is upgraded. Not really sure how we're going to handle the notifications stuff. I'm not crazy about putting any time into the bodhi_comment directive but because of the lack of notice we had on this change, fedmsg emission isn't ready and probably won't be ready for at least a week or two. I suspect that we'll need to take a stab at fixing the bodhi_comment directive and hope that the effort required there won't be too bad. The discussion around this will continue as we figure out what to do about it :-/ https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T558 resultsdb --------- There has been a fix for HTTP_X_FORWARDED_SCHEME waiting push for a while now but the bodhi folks requested it again today. I fixed an issue with the code in 'develop', did a new relese, built it and updated dev. Everything seems to be going fine with the new version and not much changed so I'm not expecting many problems.

1 1

pungi4 example / test runs
by Adam Williamson 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

Hi, folks. I know this is interesting to me, so it may be to you. Pungi4 test / example composes can be found here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/ so you can see the various new metadata it produces. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

openQA: run 'all' nightly instead of 'current'?
by Adam Williamson 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

Hi folks! So I was wondering: what do folks think about running openQA's 'all' mode nightly (on the BOS deployment) instead of the 'current' mode? 'all' mode is the one I wrote a while back that tests each night's Rawhide and Branched composes in addition to the 'current' validation compose. I think it'd be nice to have an idea every day if Rawhide and/or Branched are broken. We could then actually write some kind of 'israwhidebroken.com' thing. Ideally we'd be doing this with fedmsg integration, but doing it nightly isn't too terrible. So can anyone see a reason we shouldn't? We have more tests now and it's taking longer, but we should still comfortably have enough time to do three complete test runs in a day, which would be the maximum. IIRC the 'current' tests get run first, so the nightly tests would not be delaying the more important validation tests (and if that's not the case it would be easy to change). The reason I don't do this on the happyassassin deployment is simply bandwidth - I'm already nearly at my monthly cap and downloading a bunch of images nightly would push me over. But I don't think that applies to bos. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

3 4

Proposal to Cancel: 2015-08-17 Fedora QA Devel Meeting
by Tim Flink 15 Aug '15

15 Aug '15

Since many folks are going to be returning from Flock and there's not really a shortage of stuff to do, I'm proposing that we cancel the QA devel next week. If anyone can think of a topic that should be discussed as a group now, reply to this thread and we can still meet. Otherwise, we'll just sync up as needed outside the meeting. Tim

1 0

pungi 4 fedmsg integration ticket
by Adam Williamson 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

Hi, folks. I found the ticket for adding fedmsg support to pungi 4 (The New Pungi): https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/25 I added a comment with my initial thoughts on what messages would be useful for openQA integration, you guys may have more/different thoughts I guess. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

Proposal to Cancel: 2015-08-10 Fedora QA Devel Meeting
by Tim Flink 10 Aug '15

10 Aug '15

Many of the regular attendees are either traveling to Flock or preparing to do so and I don't think that a meeting today would end up being very productive. If anyone can think of a topic that should be discussed as a group now, reply to this thread and we can still meet. Otherwise, we'll just sync up as needed outside the meeting. Tim

1 0

2015-08-03 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting
by Tim Flink 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

# Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2015-08-03 # Time: 14:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net If you have any topics to add, respond to this email or bring them up during open floor. Tim Proposed agenda =============== Status Updates -------------- - Please have #info statements ready so we can get through this as quickly as possible Possible Topics To Cover ------------------------ - Flock preparations These are optional and may be covered - group discretion after status updates. Open Floor ---------- - TBD

1 0

New openQA custom storage tests
by Adam Williamson 01 Aug '15

01 Aug '15

Hey folks! Just to let you know - I have three new custom storage tests (BTRFS, LVM thinp and ext3) written, tested and ready to roll, I'm just gonna hold off until D481 lands for clarity (as it changes anacondalog -> anacondatest etc), so I'll send a diff on Monday, assuming you folks land D481 Monday your time. One of the tests even found a bug: LVM thin partitioning is broken - https://openqa.happyassassin.net/tests/3441 . I reproduced it manually and filed a bug. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

qa-devel August 2015