On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 05:33 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Oh, Jerry beat me to it by taking a different route and disabling most test. That should work too, but I think it hides real problems with the python3 code...
Yeah. Please don't just disable tests. Tests exist for a reason.
We need to disable *some* tests, at least if we hope to build this quickly. It's just a question whether to disable more or less of them.
Most tests fail because of sympy/pyglet/xvfb/opengl interaction (#904851), not from sympy error per se — the same tests run fine on a "real" display.
Oh, sorry if I stepped on somebody's toes. i didn't realize others were trying to fix sympy, too. I guess I should join the python SIG mailing list, but I'm already on far too many mailing lists...
No, no, there were no toes to step on. I didn't announce anywhere that I'm working on this. And anyway, I think our work is complementary: I didn't know about the patch you pulled in, but otoh, I managed to fix some of the tests by passing options to xvfb.
I'll try to push some of my changes too, let's see if that builds.
But I don't understand what you mean about me disabling tests. I haven't disabled any tests, much less "most tests". i did add a BR on pyglets, then discovered that that CAUSES test failures due to missing GLX support, and so I removed the pyglets BR again. Maybe a BR on mesa is needed as well as pyglets? I don't know.
Anyway, I checked in an experimental patch in an attempt at fixing the test failures, and now there is a different test failure. :-( So either my experimental patch isn't good enough, or it works perfectly and has unmasked another problem. I probably won't have time to figure that out for a couple of days, so if somebody else is interested in looking at it, here is the latest build failure:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=828867
Zbyszek
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:14:36PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 05:33 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Oh, Jerry beat me to it by taking a different route and disabling most test. That should work too, but I think it hides real problems with the python3 code...
Yeah. Please don't just disable tests. Tests exist for a reason.
We need to disable *some* tests, at least if we hope to build this quickly. It's just a question whether to disable more or less of them.
Most tests fail because of sympy/pyglet/xvfb/opengl interaction (#904851), not from sympy error per se — the same tests run fine on a "real" display.
Oh, sorry if I stepped on somebody's toes. i didn't realize others were trying to fix sympy, too. I guess I should join the python SIG mailing list, but I'm already on far too many mailing lists...
No, no, there were no toes to step on. I didn't announce anywhere that I'm working on this. And anyway, I think our work is complementary: I didn't know about the patch you pulled in, but otoh, I managed to fix some of the tests by passing options to xvfb.
Sympy is now built. I had to disable a few tests... Those seems to be actual (and known) bugs in sympy, I added some links to upstream bug reports.
I tried building nipy [1], but it fails in tests. No too badly though, apparently just three tests, out of 2599.
Zbyszek
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17326509
python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org