Pete Travis me@petetravis.com schrieb am Mon Jan 26 2015 at 5:24:32 PM:
On 01/26/2015 08:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
since bug #1126521 seems to be progressing nicely, I think it would be nice to get in touch with python-sig, the maintainers of python3-dateutil, about retiring python3-dateutil and adding a python3 subpackage to python-dateutil. They might want to do it the other way around, which would be fine too, but either way, something should be arranged.
I tried to sign up for the python-sig mailing list, but it is "private" and I haven't received any welcome letter, so I think I'm stuck in some moderation queue.
Zbyszek
Yes, I think it's a good time to bring up retiring python3-dateutil. I've also requested membership for that list, and included the list owners here, maybe they can expedite our requests.
As python-dateutil is not (yet) under the python-sig group maintainership [1], you could reach the maintainers of python-dateutil under ther -owner mail address (CC'ed). python-sig@fp.o is for all group maintained package maintainers and general python related questions are handled on python-devel@fp.o (also CC'ed). (Sorry for the confusion, the python-sig groupmaintainership started very recently and is still a work in process.)
I'd say it depends, how python3 will be introduced in F22, which package should provide the subpackage and the other one should be retired. Maybe someone from [2] could comment on what they like to see in the future. I don't mind having two separate packages until we approach F22 and the future process is here.
Greetings, Tom
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-dateutil/ [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
----- Original Message -----
Pete Travis < me@petetravis.com > schrieb am Mon Jan 26 2015 at 5:24:32 PM:
On 01/26/2015 08:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
since bug #1126521 seems to be progressing nicely, I think it would be
nice to get in touch with python-sig, the maintainers of
python3-dateutil, about retiring python3-dateutil and adding a python3
subpackage to python-dateutil. They might want to do it the other way
around, which would be fine too, but either way, something should be
arranged.
I tried to sign up for the python-sig mailing list, but it is
"private" and I haven't received any welcome letter, so I think I'm
stuck in some moderation queue.
Zbyszek
Yes, I think it's a good time to bring up retiring python3-dateutil.
I've also requested membership for that list, and included the list
owners here, maybe they can expedite our requests.
As python-dateutil is not (yet) under the python-sig group maintainership [1], you could reach the maintainers of python-dateutil under ther -owner mail address (CC'ed). python-sig@fp.o is for all group maintained package maintainers and general python related questions are handled on python-devel@fp.o (also CC'ed). (Sorry for the confusion, the python-sig groupmaintainership started very recently and is still a work in process.)
I'd say it depends, how python3 will be introduced in F22, which package should provide the subpackage and the other one should be retired. Maybe someone from [2] could comment on what they like to see in the future. I don't mind having two separate packages until we approach F22 and the future process is here.
Greetings, Tom
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-dateutil/ [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
Packaging Python extension modules should keep working the way it did up until F21. python-dateutil will still be the Python2 build, python3-datetuil will still be the Python3 build. There are some guidelines changes that I proposed for F22 [1], but I think they don't influence dateutil.
Slavek
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:59:13AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Packaging Python extension modules should keep working the way it
did up until F21. python-dateutil will still be the Python2 build, python3-datetuil will still be the Python3 build. There are some guidelines changes that I proposed for F22 [1], but I think they don't influence dateutil.
python{,3}-dateutil have no executables, so this does not apply to them at all.
Zbyszek
python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org