Agreed. And if a maintainer decides to stick with the python36 name,
they MUST provide the equivalent python3 name. I've captured those
for what I'll add to the guidelines.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:30 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 21. 01. 21 7:19, Carl George wrote:
> I propose that we standardize
> on the python3 prefix to match RHEL7 packages and document in EPEL
> guidelines that maintainers SHOULD use the python3 prefix.
I'm fine with that, is we also say they MUST use %python_provide (or that the
packages MUST provide/obsolete python36-...).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
Carl George