On 05-05-2023 15:10, Sandro wrote:
On 27-04-2023 14:26, Sandro wrote:
Well, I submitted the package for review [2] and have been told that vkbasalt not being published on PyPI is an issue wrt naming parity. So, I filed a bug requesting publication on PyPI [3], but I haven't heard back from upstream, yet. If upstream remains unresponsive, I would need to either publish it myself or get the name reserved as described in PyPI parity [4].
It has been almost two weeks and I haven't heard back from upstream regarding my request for publication on PyPI.
Still no news from upstream. But I'd like to move on with packaging vkbasalt-cli. Meanwhile bug reports regarding Bottles keep pouring [1] in. Well, at least is shows that there's a user base for that package.
What are the next steps I should take in line with PyPI parity? I'm leaning towards "Ask Python SIG to block the name on PyPI for you" and will consider publishing it myself at a later stage should upstream remain unresponsive.
Did I misunderstand/misinterpret the guidelines? The review is currently stalled due to the PyPI parity issue.
Should I approach PyPI folks myself and ask them to block vkbasalt-cli for me? Any kind of guidance is much appreciated.
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 [3] https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/vkbasalt-cli/-/issues/10 [4] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_pypi_pari...
[1] I'm exaggerating ;-)
-- Sandro