On 03/20/2015 08:52 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[snip]
There's also conversations to be had as to had as to whether we move
all archtectures to gcc-go or wait for golang 1.5 in (probably) F-23
and just use that. It's too late for F-22 cycle anyway IMO.
Will it be acceptable to have gccgo for ppc64 and s390x archs only based on
relative stability of gccgo over golang ? Or it's completely unacceptable to
have different set of build tools based on archs ?
Just wanted to hear everyone's thoughts here.
Peter
_______________________________________________
ppc mailing list
ppc(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ppc
--
Regards,
Pradipta Kumar B
IBM Systems & Technology Labs,
India.