FWIW, I favor the move also. Get everything under one "roof"
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
----- Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 07/28/2011 09:47 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've not been involved much on the fedora-ppc list. I've been looking
> into extending to the Fedora release criteria [1] to allow secondary
> architectures, like PPC, to provide a consistent goal-post for
> determining release readiness.
>
> My topic for this mail though is whether it would be appropriate to move
> this list to
lists.fedoraproject.org [2]? There is certainly no rule
> that says Fedora secondary architecture mailing lists must exist on
>
lists.fp.org, but I thought for consistency it might be good to move the
> list there.
>
> Any thoughts/concerns/objections? If not, I'll be happy to submit a
> request to move things over.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
> [2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
I'm personally in favour of moving it so that the ML is hosted at the
right place.
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Supervisor Core Services | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web:
http://www.redhat.com/
D-70178 Stuttgart, Germany
_______________________________________________
Fedora-ppc mailing list
Fedora-ppc(a)lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ppc