Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Summary: FTBFS perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mo ck-results/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: perl-RRD-Simple AssignedTo: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: ftbfs@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Blocks: 463452 Classification: Fedora
perl-RRD-Simple-1.43-3.fc9.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
John Poelstra poelstra@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318299) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318299) root.log
root.log for i386
--- Comment #2 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318300) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318300) build.log
build.log for i386
--- Comment #3 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318301) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318301) mock.log
mock.log for i386
--- Comment #4 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318302) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318302) root.log
root.log for x86_64
--- Comment #5 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318303) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318303) build.log
build.log for x86_64
--- Comment #6 from FTBFS ftbfs@fedoraproject.org 2008-10-01 11:43:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=318304) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=318304) mock.log
mock.log for x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10
Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting@redhat.com Blocks|463452(F10FTBFS) |486693(F11FTBFS)
--- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-11-25 22:19:53 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Blocks|486693(F11FTBFS) |511348(F12FTBFS)
--- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org 2009-07-15 04:45:10 EDT --- Problem reported upstream: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=46193
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org 2009-07-15 04:46:37 EDT --- *** Bug 511512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt_domsch@dell.com
--- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-10-22 15:42:30 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=121463 failed in Koji.
It also appears that the upstream is not fixing bugs on this package anymore; last fixed bugs were a year ago.
# repoquery --whatrequires --recursive perl-RRD-Simple (empty set)
Can this simply dropped then?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #11 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-10-22 16:29:02 EDT --- This package failed to build in Koji for Fedora 12, and at this point in the release cycle (Beta is out), we'll have to live with the F11 build of the package unless there is another bug in your package which would prevent the release of Fedora 12.
If your package is now obsolete and should be removed from Fedora 12 and future, please follow the End of Life instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
If your package is not obsolete, and you wish it to remain in the distribution for Fedora 13, please update your package's devel branch in CVS so that it builds, build it in koji, and close this bug as "CLOSED RAWHIDE", including the link to the koji build that succeeded. You can do this now, while final touches are being placed on Fedora 12 without affecting F12.
Shortly after F12 is out, but before the F13 Alpha release, all F12FTBFS-blocking bugs will be re-evaluated. At that time, if progress has not been made to fix the package, it will be removed from the distribution for F13.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@city-fan.org
--- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org 2009-10-22 17:24:04 EDT --- As this package is required by a few (I believe) other packages, and only one of the tests is failing, and that only fails if perl(Test::Deep) is available, I'd be inclined to just disable that test (or BuildConflict perl(Test::Deep) instead of BuildRequire-ing it) and build the latest version (1.44).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-10-22 17:44:25 EDT --- Paul, however you want to handle it is fine. repoquery on rawhide today doesn't show anything that requires this package though.
repoquery --whatrequires 'perl(RRD::Simple*)' yields nothing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #14 from Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org 2009-10-23 04:15:32 EDT --- Well it's Chris' package, not mine so it's up to him. I think I must have been confusing it with rrdtool when I thought there were other packages needing it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cweyl@alumni.drew.edu |mmaslano@redhat.com
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com 2010-03-02 13:01:45 EST --- Reassigning to new package owner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Guil Barros gbarros@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gbarros@redhat.com
--- Comment #17 from Guil Barros gbarros@redhat.com 2010-03-02 14:40:39 EST --- As per Paul's request, here is my blurb on RRD:Simple. This is a good package to quickly prototype perl-rrd apps without worrying too much about configuring esoteric rrd options. I find that i tend to start by using RRD::Simple and then when I decide to put more effort into the project I move to using full RRD for the more granular options. It would be a shame if we retired this, in fact it would be great if we packaged the latest version.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano@redhat.com |paul@city-fan.org
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com 2010-03-03 06:54:45 EST --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-03 09:31:54 EST --- perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-5.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-03 20:34:13 EST --- perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-RRD-Simple'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F13/FEDORA-2010-3614
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-14 09:42:52 EDT --- perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464964
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |perl-RRD-Simple-1.44-5.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org