Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> writes:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:09 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> wrote:
> > > This could at least stabilize things for F7 -- everything is present
> > > the way it was in fc6,
> > Exactly: No progress.
> >
> > Development-wise a step backwards.
>
> At least this way we'd get a chance to take a breath, address concerns
> that a number of people have with this, and plan for F8 in a sensible
> way.
<Sigh/> Red Hat, you've had all of your chances in your hands, but you
missed them - once again.
It's a compromise. It's not perfect, but it makes forward progress
without annoying too many people. Like I said, we can work on fixing it
better early in the F8 cycle this time, rather than so late in the F7
cycle.
And, don't say "Red Hat" - that's pointless, because there's no
personal
responsibility when you blame an entire company. If you want to point
fingers, blame me, because it was my call.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching