Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Summary: RFE: split /usr/bin/padre into own subpackage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Padre AssignedTo: mmaslano@redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmaslano@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=349494) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349494) spec file patch
It would be nice (and make more sense) if we could split /usr/bin/padre into a "padre" subpackage here, the same way we do for nopaste (perl-App-Nopaste), asciio (perl-App-Asciio) and git-cpan-patch (perl-Git-CPAN-Patch), to name a couple.
I've attached a patch to do this :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-06-26 10:23:45 EDT --- I'd like to add it into rawhide in version 0.36, which is waiting for threads update. Thank you for your patch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
--- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-06-26 15:00:18 EDT --- Awesome :) This should make it easy to add to the "Perl Development" group in comps.xml, too :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-06-29 03:25:45 EDT --- I have strange feeling that there wasn't any agreement on packages which should be in devel group in comps.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com/msg09402.html
I'm not in favour to add f.e. all Catalyst modules and omit some other modules which could be used by bigger group of "silent" users. Maybe the devel group could be filled with modules which has the biggest score on cpan or number of downloads, in case it has to be created.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
--- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2009-06-29 11:32:47 EDT --- Take a look at what's in comps.xml.in right now; the packages listed in there now fall under "a package should be in this group if it's reasonably related to Perl development and it's not just one of the zillion perl-* packages." Padre would seem to me to be a package like that.
We can discuss this more on the list as needed. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@freenet.de
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de 2009-06-29 11:38:42 EDT --- IMHO: padre is just one application amongst many. Having it in comps.xml is greasy kid-stuff and doesn't make any sense at all. .
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
--- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova mmaslano@redhat.com 2009-08-21 07:01:55 EDT --- I'll split this in next update. I'm planning update after perl-5.10.1 where are threads in version which is needed by padre package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl@alumni.drew | |.edu)
--- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-01-18 06:10:30 EST --- Finally it was updated, but now I don't see any gain from splitting it into two sub-packages. Could you explain it more?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cweyl@alumni.drew | |.edu) |
--- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl cweyl@alumni.drew.edu 2010-01-18 13:57:46 EST --- Having the application (/usr/bin/padre) in a "padre" package would distinguish it from perl libraries (e.g. perl-*), make it consistent with git-cpan-patch, asciio, no paste and others, and make it easier for end-users to find and install.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
--- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-01-19 08:40:50 EST --- Well, it's not a rule, so not every package is split on library and application subpackages. End-user can install Padre even if we provide it, which looks more clean to me.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508194
Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #10 from Marcela Mašláňová mmaslano@redhat.com 2010-03-01 05:31:40 EST --- I solve this by providing padre binary in Provides. Now it's possible to install by 'yum install padre'.
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org