Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts Product: Fedora Core Version: fc6 Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl AssignedTo: rnorwood@redhat.com ReportedBy: christopher.murtagh@gmail.com QAContact: dkl@redhat.com CC: dwmw2@redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Description of problem:
perl.ppc64's @INC doesn't include paths where most perl binary packages are, perl-BerkeleyDB.ppc for example.
[root@mybox~]# locate BerkeleyDB.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc-linux-thread-multi/BerkeleyDB.pm
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
current (from base)
How reproducible:
100%. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install perl.ppc, perl.ppc64, install perl-BerkelyDB. 2. Then perl -e 'use BerkeleyDB; exit;' 3. There is no step 3... heh, there is no step 3.
Actual results:
Can't locate BerkeleyDB.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/ppc64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at /usr/sbin/postgrey line 14.
Expected results:
Successful compilation and exit without error.
Additional info:
The workaround was to yum erase perl.ppc64, fetch the perl.ppc rpm and rpm -i --replacepkgs --replacefiles (because they both dump perl in /usr/bin/perl, so removing the perl.ppc64 still left the 64 bit binary).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Version|fc6 |6
mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |galak@kernel.crashing.org
------- Additional Comments From mmaslano@redhat.com 2008-02-21 10:09 EST ------- *** Bug 213285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rnorwood@redhat.com |mmaslano@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage- | |list@redhat.com Status Whiteboard| | bzcl34nup
------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-04-04 02:47 EST ------- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks.
If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL
If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change.
Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point.
The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp
We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
mmaslano@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|6 |rawhide
------- Additional Comments From mmaslano@redhat.com 2008-05-05 07:55 EST ------- The multilib problem wasn't still solved for ppc64.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
------- Additional Comments From dwmw2@redhat.com 2008-05-05 08:38 EST ------- Well, rpm now favours 32-bit binaries so the test case should now pass, because you'll get a 32-bit /usr/bin/perl and it'll be able to find the BerkeleyDB module.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl.ppc64 @INC problem, perl.ppc conflicts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235553
fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dwmw2@redhat.com |
------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-05-13 22:44 EST ------- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla