Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Summary: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ? Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert@lowlatency.de ReportedBy: kwizart@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Description of problem: libpTk.a is built statically within perl-Tk package. This file isn't provided, so any dependency that what to extend the widget for perl-Tk will need to build again this static library. I would be better to have a shared built instead (if doable)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current perl-Tk
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. built a perl-Tk dependency that extend the widget capability (case study perl-Tk-TableMatrix, see #444745) 2. by default it will build the libpTk.a again 3. Each Shared Objet widget will pick from libpTk.a as needed, raising the size of the resulting .so (if not having duplicate code).
Actual results: -llibpTk is using libpTk.a
Expected results: -llibpTk should use libpTk.so
Additional info: The related licenses files should probably be added to the package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|444745 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwizart@gmail.com 2008-10-28 11:34:36 EDT --- Any News ? Question/Answear from upsteam ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2008-11-25 21:35:14 EDT ---
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'.
More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwizart@gmail.com 2009-04-14 12:18:52 EDT --- Have this problem been forwarded upstream ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
--- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-11-18 07:37:14 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2009-12-18 01:15:39 EDT ---
Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla