https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
This makes the test to pass:
diff --git a/t/50resolver.t b/t/50resolver.t
index 7047b9d..587eb21 100644
--- a/t/50resolver.t
+++ b/t/50resolver.t
@@ -326,11 +326,13 @@ my $missinghost = "TbK4jM2M0OS.lm57DWIyu4i";
SKIP: {
skip "Resolver has an answer for $missinghost", 1 if gethostbyname(
$missinghost );
- my $future = wait_for_future $resolver->getaddrinfo(
+ my $future = $resolver->getaddrinfo(
host => $missinghost,
service => "80",
socktype => SOCK_STREAM,
+ timeout => 60,
);
+ wait_for { $future->is_ready } timeout => 60;
ok( $future->failure, '$future failed for missing host' );
is( ( $future->failure )[1], "resolve", '->failure [1] gives
resolve' );
Maybe one could measure the "skip" command delay and use that period instead of
the hard-coded 60 seconds. But if a resolver cached missed, and the cache
expired, the measure would be unreliable.
Nevertheless I will need this patch to apply because the current code will fail
in my weekly rebuilds.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.