https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

Roman Aleksic roman.aleksic@idh.ch changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roman.aleksic@idh.ch

--- Comment #2 from Roman Aleksic roman.aleksic@idh.ch --- We are trying to install glpi-agent (https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi-agent) on CentOS 9 Stream, which has perl-XML-TreePP as a requirement. Any news on an ETA? Thanks.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

--- Comment #4 from Sergio Basto sergio@serjux.com --- Not good news , Marianne not have any activity since Fev 2022 (expect in a tag_package_owners entry!?!? )

Last login in FAS: jehane 2021-02-18

Last action on koji: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 tag_package_owners entry created by humaton [still active]

Last package update on bodhi: 2021-02-01 13:54:59 on package perl-POE-Component-Client-Ping-1.176-1.fc33 Last actions performed according to fedmsg: - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2022-01-15 01:23:48 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2022-01-15 01:23:48 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2022-01-04 15:03:10 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2022-01-04 15:03:09 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2021-12-13 16:34:31 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.new on 2021-12-13 16:34:31 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.update on 2021-12-12 02:40:57 - org.fedoraproject.prod.bugzilla.bug.new on 2021-12-12 02:40:57

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

--- Comment #6 from Sergio Basto sergio@serjux.com --- (In reply to Gary Buhrmaster from comment #5)

(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #4)

...

Not good news , Marianne not have any activity since Fev 2022 (expect in a tag_package_owners entry!?!? )

I *think* the various tag_package_owner values are artifacts of other workflows, and not directly related to activity (I have seen such values for others that I believe are no longer active).

I will not be surprised if Marianne will be identified in the list to come out shortly (now that F37 has been released) of inactive packagers and cleanups. And that will end up orphaning perl-XML-TreePP.

If no one else picks it up first if orphaned I will likely choose to do so (when I looked some time ago perl-XML-TreePP seemed to not be especially onerous to maintain), and will then branch for epel9.

Can you open an unresponsive maintainer request please , I think is the best solution

Thank you

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

--- Comment #8 from Gary Buhrmaster gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com --- I have taken ownership of the packaged after it was orphaned as part of the packager cleanup.

Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/49373

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

Gary Buhrmaster gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|marianne@tuxette.fr |gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031448

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |perl-XML-TreePP-0.43-24.el9 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed| |2022-12-08 01:10:40

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-69649340de has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.