On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 15:31 -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:45PM -0700, Chris Grau wrote:
> So far parrot builds in mock. Rpmlint is unhappy, though. I'll post
> with more later.
This one makes rpmlint slightly happier:
If you ignore all of the wrong-script-interpreter warnings (and I
think you should), that just leaves these:
W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/subproxy.so
W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/dynlexpad.so
W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/match_group.so
W: parrot unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/parrot/dynext/gdbmhash.so
And honestly, I'm not sure what to do with those...
Without looking, they probably need to be set chmod +x so that the
debuginfo scripts will strip them properly.
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!