Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [RFE] sa package should setup sa-update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219078
shiva(a)sewingwitch.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |shiva(a)sewingwitch.com
------- Additional Comments From shiva(a)sewingwitch.com 2006-12-14 11:33 EST -------
Re comment #11:
Not all SA clients use spamc/spamd. Some are Perl-based and use the underlying
Mail::SpamAssassin classes directly. MIMEDefang is the one I use. It spawns its
own Perl-based slaves that invoke SA.
I'd recommend that the restart script not chain services that need to be
restarted on one command line with &&.
Is there some package-oriented producer/consumer scheme such that multiple
services can register interest in an event like this? Perhaps the thing to do is
to provide a directory somewhere where other packages can drop scripts that will
be invoked when sa-update reports that new content has arrived. If spamd is
enabled, a script to restart it can be dropped in this directory.
This machinery should all be pushed upstream.
See also
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 where the
idea of breaking sa-update out into its own subpackage is being discussed.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.