--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
Florian, I guess I should dig into the ppc64 code and see why
not accurately tracking this. But since you recently touched this code is
there any possibility this code really be an undefined memory usage?
The changes are supposed to be no-ops in this regard.
My first guess is that due to the strcmp changes for POWER, we now have a
dependency on uninitialized bytes due to word-wise memory accesses, but this
does not appear in strcmp itself for some reason, only in the caller which
looks at the computed result difference.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.