https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2016-09-19 07:43:06
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #0)
Thus I think the spec file should
mention "GPL+ or Artistic" in the License tag. Now it declares "Artistic
2.0" only.
I do not agree. This perl-dist is clearly licensed Aritistic-2.0 as whole.
The fact contains a "GPL or Artistic" licenced file is irrelevant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.