Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [RFE] sa package should setup sa-update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219078
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2006-12-12 03:12 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
A few comments:
1) Shouldn't that be "service spamassassin condrestart", not "service
spamassassin restart"?
+1 Sure, if the sa service supports it
2) Adding SARE by default is a great idea IMHO, but it might be best
to come up
with some generic way of adding additional update channels. (One of my clients
is considering setting up a private update channel for their local SA rules,
for
example.)
The way sa-update is setup it really wants a single command with all the
channels stuffed in it, unless you want cascading service restarts after a long
unsynchronization.
But then, I'm sure a perl guru can come up with a smart solution
3) What about restarting amavisd? Or any other SA-using process, for
that
matter. It might be worth making that a configurable thing as well.
I think all the modern sa users communicate with sa through smamc/spamd, so they
should pick up changes as soon as spamd is restarted
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.